PokerTimeOnline Poker Room and Poker Tournaments - Carbon Poker

Home > High Stakes Poker > View on Poker – Peter Eastgate beats Tom Dwan on High Stakes Poker!

View on Poker – Peter Eastgate beats Tom Dwan on High Stakes Poker!

November 21st, 2009

Visit www.viewonpoker.com for more great poker videos, poker strategy, freerolls, exclusive poker offers and much more. Peter Eastgate wins against Tom Dwan on High Stakes Poker when both players hold set of sixes.

High Stakes Poker , , , , ,

  1. whathehell
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #1

    1.50 , rain man impression ah ah

  2. foreverguga
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #2

    Indeed, durrrr is the best cash player ever but I don’t see why he’s so stunned by the flat call on the river. Nobody would call a big raise with a worse hand than A6 on the river there, so I don’t see the point of raising on the river for Peter. 90% of the times he gets a fold and in 10% or more he gets reraised and needs to throw his hand away

  3. giaspanu
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #3

    Peter’s hand was vulnerable as well, it could have been beat by lot of hands,
    The call is correct, at least on the river.
    If he raises the turn and Tom Moves in, It could be a tough call for Peter, unless he has a shallow stack.
    The turn call manages the size of the pot and
    gain another Tom’s bet.
    I guess Peter was afraid of a 56 type of hand!

  4. GeneticFreaks
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #4

    raise the turn and posible Durr wold of gone all in on the river :D

  5. JDLupus
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #5

    Certainly possible, ‘Tis Dwan…

  6. unfito
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #6

    All the bigger pots where runned more than once, so, yeah, Dwan has won the biggest pot ever televised.

  7. rigbst
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #7

    KK, K6, 65, 63, 47, 42, 33, 55?

    Eastgate reraise the river with 9th nuts – unlikely. Dwan call reraise with 15th nuts – Impossible.

  8. rigbst
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #8

    agreed. you have to make thin value bets with a wider range to make sure you get value for your premium holdings at those levels.

  9. rigbst
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #9

    i wish i had the money to play a 175k pot!

  10. Raulthink
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #10

    even my grand mother could beat dwan with this dominated improbable hand… just a lucky spot of eastgate

  11. fromtheabove
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #11

    im no pro like these guys but i wouldnt have raised either, he is beat by alot hands. KK he is beat by but the hand wasnt played out as if tom had KK so he wasnt worried about that, but 55, 33, 56 are all possible and 36 is less likely but still possible. 24 and 47 are a longshot but they had him beat too, i’d be happy to take a 175K pot without risking losing even more with the 6th nuts

  12. fromtheabove
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #12

    damn I wish i could lose a 175K pot and laugh it off.

  13. 074Jesse
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #13

    Lol @ 2:46…. Greenstein probably said that before he lost with his AA against durrrr XD

  14. 074Jesse
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #14

    Peter PeastPate is a PopaPu Pakkapongo

  15. aparkhurst1
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #15

    The cards did a lot more to beat Dwan than Eastgate did.

  16. Celmak1
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #16

    HSP and other EDITED tv shows are deceptive empirical evidence as they dramatize hands and personalities for ratings. Gabe K. is a great host when he is not forced (by a production crew) to exalt a player/hand needlessly. A smart observer would easily detect how Gabe’s commentary “evolved” from ep 7 onwards. If you refer to hands between him and Greens. as “the” hand, you are wrong. HSP had 3 bigger hands in S4. Finally, check out Lichtenberger in WSOP 2009 to see a good WSOP start.

  17. unfito
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #17

    The key thing is that the metagame on FTP (where Tom and Sahamies play every day) is so agressive that a value raise with top kicker may be standard.

    But in lower stakes i guess you can’t raise that hand against a competent player.

  18. andos8888
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #18

    “peter eastgate gives it the big marobojungle kind of stare”lol gabes hilarious ” COLLL”

  19. iamanticop
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #19

    REALLY?…….aggro online player and nothing else?…..he ran over every player on hsp this season, made two final tables at his first wsop, has 1mil in live tourney earnings, and has played the biggest pot ever televised. When you can eclipse these records, then say hes no good, until then give the man props for being the best.

  20. hert0gjan
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #20

    yeah he beats the fricking minimum :P

  21. 074Jesse
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #21

    The hardest thing when u play against durrrr is to put him on something: it could be anything doest matter how big the preflop (re)raise is.

  22. 074Jesse
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #22

    Eastgate is a Muppet

  23. jugganaut35
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #23

    That’s true. Dwan is known to play just about anything to a raise, so he could have easily been playing 56 and made the boat.

    It’s hard to put Dwan on any hand and Eastgate didn’t even have 4th or 5th nuts there so just flat calling such a big raise was probably the smart play.

  24. flamboyant514
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #24

    Totally agree, it was a good play just to call in my own, Durr could easily had a fullhouse or a straight with that board

  25. 4thwonder
    November 21st, 2009 at 11:42 | #25

    dwan makes it sound so obv that he’d call if eastgate raised. he’s lying right?

  1. No trackbacks yet.